0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 07:29:53 EDT 2024 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p 0.47/0.65 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.47/0.65 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.47/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # new_ho_10 with pid 10152 completed with status 0 0.47/0.65 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.47/0.65 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.47/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.47/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied 0.47/0.65 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC 0.47/0.65 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.47/0.65 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 487s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_3 with 82s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting sh3 with 82s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting pre_casc_2 with 82s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # sh3 with pid 10162 completed with status 0 0.47/0.65 # Result found by sh3 0.47/0.65 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.47/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.47/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied 0.47/0.65 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC 0.47/0.65 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.47/0.65 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 487s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting new_ho_3 with 82s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Starting sh3 with 82s (1) cores 0.47/0.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s 0.47/0.65 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.47/0.65 0.47/0.65 # Proof found! 0.47/0.65 # SZS status Theorem 0.47/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_sort2, type, formula_a: $tType). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_sort3, type, trace_1367752404list_a: $tType). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_sort4, type, prefix1027212443list_a: $tType). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_26, type, monito1457594016ress_a: trace_1367752404list_a > formula_a > nat > nat). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_27, type, ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_29, type, ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_32, type, plen_P694648887list_a: prefix1027212443list_a > nat). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_36, type, phi_1: formula_a). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_38, type, pi: prefix1027212443list_a). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_39, type, sigma: trace_1367752404list_a). 0.47/0.65 thf(decl_46, type, k: nat). 0.47/0.65 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (ord_less_nat @ k @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', conj_0)). 0.47/0.65 thf(fact_182_not__le__imp__less, axiom, ![X34:nat, X54:nat]:((~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X34 @ X54))=>(ord_less_nat @ X54 @ X34))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', fact_182_not__le__imp__less)). 0.47/0.65 thf(fact_194_dual__order_Ostrict__trans2, axiom, ![X7:nat, X8:nat, X14:nat]:((((ord_less_eq_nat @ X14 @ X7)=>(ord_less_nat @ X14 @ X8))<=(ord_less_nat @ X7 @ X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', fact_194_dual__order_Ostrict__trans2)). 0.47/0.65 thf(fact_181_less__le__not__le, axiom, ((ord_less_nat)=(^[X38:nat, X39:nat]:((~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X39 @ X38))&(ord_less_eq_nat @ X38 @ X39))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', fact_181_less__le__not__le)). 0.47/0.65 thf(fact_20_progress__le, axiom, ![X123:trace_1367752404list_a, X181:formula_a, X10:nat]:((ord_less_eq_nat @ (monito1457594016ress_a @ X123 @ X181 @ X10) @ X10)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', fact_20_progress__le)). 0.47/0.65 thf(fact_0__092_060open_062k_A_060_AMonitor__Mirabelle__prbptmgypa_Oprogress_A_092_060sigma_062_A_092_060phi_0621_A_Iplen_A_092_060pi_062_J_092_060close_062, axiom, (ord_less_nat @ k @ (monito1457594016ress_a @ sigma @ phi_1 @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pMPKezuuJ2/E---3.1_10074.p', fact_0__092_060open_062k_A_060_AMonitor__Mirabelle__prbptmgypa_Oprogress_A_092_060sigma_062_A_092_060phi_0621_A_Iplen_A_092_060pi_062_J_092_060close_062)). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(ord_less_nat @ k @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X34:nat, X54:nat]:((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X34 @ X54)=>(ord_less_nat @ X54 @ X34))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_182_not__le__imp__less])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X7:nat, X8:nat, X14:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X7 @ X8)=>((ord_less_eq_nat @ X14 @ X7)=>(ord_less_nat @ X14 @ X8)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_194_dual__order_Ostrict__trans2])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(ord_less_nat @ k @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1244:nat, X1245:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1244 @ X1245)|(ord_less_nat @ X1245 @ X1244))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1089:nat, X1090:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X1089 @ X1090)<=>(~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1090 @ X1089)&(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1089 @ X1090)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_181_less__le__not__le])])])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1798:nat, X1799:nat, X1800:nat]:((~(ord_less_nat @ X1798 @ X1799)|(~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1800 @ X1798)|(ord_less_nat @ X1800 @ X1799)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((ord_less_nat @ k @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X3:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ X3)|(ord_less_nat @ X3 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X1204:nat, X1205:nat]:((((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1205 @ X1204)|~(ord_less_nat @ X1204 @ X1205))&((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1204 @ X1205)|~(ord_less_nat @ X1204 @ X1205)))&((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1205 @ X1204)|~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1204 @ X1205)|(ord_less_nat @ X1204 @ X1205)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X4:nat, X3:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X4 @ X3)|~((ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X3))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X4 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (ord_less_eq_nat @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi) @ k), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:nat, X2:nat]:((~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ X3))|~((ord_less_nat @ X3 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi) @ X2)|~((ord_less_nat @ k @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X1867:trace_1367752404list_a, X1868:formula_a, X1869:nat]:((ord_less_eq_nat @ (monito1457594016ress_a @ X1867 @ X1868 @ X1869) @ X1869)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_20_progress__le])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:nat]:((~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi)))|~((ord_less_nat @ k @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_22, plain, (ord_less_nat @ k @ (monito1457594016ress_a @ sigma @ phi_1 @ (plen_P694648887list_a @ pi))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062k_A_060_AMonitor__Mirabelle__prbptmgypa_Oprogress_A_092_060sigma_062_A_092_060phi_0621_A_Iplen_A_092_060pi_062_J_092_060close_062])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X108:formula_a, X30:trace_1367752404list_a, X2:nat]:((ord_less_eq_nat @ (monito1457594016ress_a @ X30 @ X108 @ X2) @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.47/0.65 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']). 0.47/0.65 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.47/0.65 # Parsed axioms : 315 0.47/0.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.47/0.65 # Initial clauses : 663 0.47/0.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 46 0.47/0.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 617 0.47/0.65 # Processed clauses : 808 0.47/0.65 # ...of these trivial : 5 0.47/0.65 # ...subsumed : 234 0.47/0.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 569 0.47/0.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 78 0.47/0.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.47/0.65 # Backward-subsumed : 4 0.47/0.65 # Backward-rewritten : 3 0.47/0.65 # Generated clauses : 568 0.47/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 490 0.47/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.47/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3 0.47/0.65 # Paramodulations : 482 0.47/0.65 # Factorizations : 2 0.47/0.65 # NegExts : 0 0.47/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 83 0.47/0.65 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.47/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 100 0.47/0.65 # ...of those cached : 68 0.47/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.47/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.47/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 120 0.47/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34 0.47/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.47/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 26 0.47/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 59 0.47/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 653 0.47/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 2187 0.47/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.47/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 371 0.47/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29773 0.47/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6972 0.47/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 201 0.47/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168 0.47/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.47/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19 0.47/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 15 0.47/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.47/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0 0.47/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 74361 0.47/0.65 # Search garbage collected termcells : 12831 0.47/0.65 0.47/0.65 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.47/0.65 # User time : 0.116 s 0.47/0.65 # System time : 0.007 s 0.47/0.65 # Total time : 0.123 s 0.47/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 4908 pages 0.47/0.65 0.47/0.65 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.47/0.65 # User time : 0.421 s 0.47/0.65 # System time : 0.029 s 0.47/0.65 # Total time : 0.450 s 0.47/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2324 pages 0.47/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting 0.47/0.65 % E exiting 0.47/0.65 EOF